CECILIA M. ALTONAGA: FLORIDA J.A.I.L. 4 JUDGES, VS. THE FLOR

[russellm]

[url]CECILIA M. ALTONAGA[/url], UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE re FLORIDA J.A.I.L. 4 JUDGES, et al Plaintiff, vs. THE FLORIDA BAR, et al., Defendants.

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, MIAMI DIVISION, CASE NO. 08-20533-CIV-ALTONAGA/Brown, entitled FLORIDA J.A.I.L. 4 JUDGES, Plaintiff, vs. THE FLORIDA BAR et al, Defendants.

FLORIDA J.A.I.L. 4 JUDGES, et al Plaintiff,
vs.
THE FLORIDA BAR, et al., Defendants.

THE FLORIDA BAR Association.

http://haigreport.com/solutiontoorganisedcorruptioninlawcourtsgovernment.html
http://www.jail4judges.org/PressReleases/PR_2007-02-21.htm
http://www.floridajail4judges.org/

This case, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, MIAMI DIVISION, CASE NO. 08-20533-CIV-ALTONAGA/Brown, entitled FLORIDA J.A.I.L. 4 JUDGES, Plaintiff, vs. THE FLORIDA BAR et al, Defendants, epitomises the corruption in the legal profession and the judiciary whose members are promoted from the more corrupt members of the legal profession. The Florida chapter of JAIL4Judges brought this action against the FLORIDA BAR Association. The Florida Bar Asssociation has been acting as a corrupt political organisation to defeat the Jail initiative, in much the same way as the Bar Association of South Dakota has used a litany of corrupt methods to defeat the JAIL Initiative in South Dakota. The Florida Bar Asssociation is corruptly acting for the benefit of the Florida judiciary. This clearly displays that the lawyers interests are more closely aligned to the interests of the judiciary than to the interests of their clients. Whether they win or or lose for their client they are still entitled to payment, and the corrupt judiciary will issue orders that the corrupt lawyers are to be paid.

Two basic proposition of the Legal System:
1) Client Privilege, so lawyers can conspire with their criminal clients in secret and never be forced to devulge the substance of their discussion and
2}the proposition that the case pleaded need have no resemblance to the truth or reality so to permit criminal defendants and criminal plaintiffs to decide as late as possible in the \"legal process\", on which scenario they will stand the best chance of being able to cheat the other party to the action.

The JAIL4judges initiative is directed at making judges accountable for their decisions

This decision by CECILIA M. ALTONAGA is beyond logical dissection and cannot be subjected to rational logic. The decision is proof positive that the Justice system cannot be used to make the justice system more accountable to the people and the constitution It is a logical dilemma. Clearly, as shown in the South Dakota experience, the judiciary and legal profession can be seen as the one corrupt entity, in opposition to the Community and constitution. Asking a court to decide this matter, is to ask Ceasar to judge Ceasar. Any reasonably informed member of the community has to perceive, at the least, a significant degree of bias in a judge deciding a matter relevant to Judicial Accountability. We know the judiciary is corrupt worldwide. That is the reason for the need of the JAIL initiative. The legal profession and police forces worldwide are also corrupt. Consider: usually, police marry police and lawyers marry lawyers. No-one else would have them and they need to shore each other up to continue their \"career\" which is equivalent to their continuing their corruption.

The JAIL initiative is directed at solely the judiciary. The legal profession, as proxy for the judiciary, is opposing JAIL by every conceivable method including all corrupt methods possible.

Legislating JAIL4judges will be the final step in reforming the judiciary by securing its accountability. By one degree of separation, this should secure the accountability of the legal profession, and police worldwide. This will not just happen. The judiciary will resist in all ways possible, as shown in this case. The heavy lifting will need to be done by the Internet [the subset of the Internet, I call theWEBNET: and by such sites as the http://www.jail4judges.org/PressRelease ... -02-21.htm
http://www.floridajail4judges.org/
http://jail4judges.org
http://floridajail4judges.org
and all of my sites accessible from the index page to this site. These include
http://haigreport.com/solutiontoorganisedcorruptioninlawcourtsgovernment.html
http://haigreport.com
http://shonksandshysters.com
http://austlawpublish.com/ plus
http://RateUSJudges.com
http://RateUKJudges.com
http://RateNZJudges.com
http://RateAustralianJudges.com
http://RateCanadianJudges.com
http://RateIndianJudges.com as well as the Universal
http://RateAllJudges.com /.

-Kind regards,
**********************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
Legal Researcher,
ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
**********************************************